Oh please. Have you clicked "Random entry" there? See http://www.conservapedia.com/Cold_War for an example of the "quality" - or Richard Nixon, unless its been fixed.
Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi all, Not sure if I've seen any discussion of this, but this was interesting:
http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/wikipedia-foes-set-up-right-site/2007/03/0...
Their "Conservapedia Commandments" are intetresting too: # Everything you post must be true and verifiable. # Always cite and give credit to your sources, even if in the public domain. # Edits/new pages must be family-friendly, clean, concise, and without gossip or foul language. # When referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). "BCE" and "CE" are unacceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis. See CE. # As much as is possible, American spelling of words must be used.[1] # Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry.
I find it bizarre that the CE/AD thing is so important that it rates a mention in the Commandments. And the "true and verifiable" is a cute reference to our "verifiable, not true" :)
Steve
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l