On 1/24/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
To take that a step further some of us (myself included) find it easier to accomodate that inconsistency for the sake of openness. The other side is more willing to sacrifice openness just to have things consistent.
I wholly agree with you. The dynamism that makes Wikipedia good does not lend itself to rigid standards. Over time, some 'the way we do things' set up, but I feel that too much effort to make them rigid is counter-productive.