Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Marc Riddell wrote:
on 1/29/07 10:13 AM, Cheney Shill at
Is this not sufficiently explanatory or reliable? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primacy_effect
It could use some work. But my question is: What do you
make of it?
The real irony here is that a person who has put himself forth as a strong advocate for reliable sourcing is relying on an article that is completely lacking in such sources to make his point. :'(
To understand the irony, one must understand Marc Riddell requested I explain the primacy effect instead of relying on Wikipedia: "By all means, do explain further."
Why would I bother to adjust what I know and base it upon an unsourced article written by people of unknown expertise? Apparently the same question occurred to Marc and he decided to request the view of someone that can actually apply it. Maybe if I get unblocked one of these days, I'll consider working on the article. Apparently irony could use a little work too.
~~Pro-Lick http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (now a Wikia supported site)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com