On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Seraphim Blade wrote:
Agreed. Allowing "straightforward interpretation" guts NOR. What is straightforward, and what is over the line? What if I think my interpretation is straightforward and you don't? And why should we be fulfilling (or usurping) the role of secondary sources-distinguishing not only what is true and factual, but is important and relevant?
I am not sure how the requirement for editorial judgment guts this or any other policy.
-Phil