Mathias Schindler wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 8:54 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/12/2007, Utkarshraj Atmaram utcursch@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like about.com II, or Scholarpedia.
With the difference of Knol being licensed under CC-BY 3.0
Oo, excellent! Once the GFDL becomes compatible with CC-BY (I'm assuming the "SA" is automatic these days) there can be free traffic between the two. I was a bit worried they'd be locked up behind some incompatible license.