On 20/10/2007, fredbaud@waterwiki.info fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
Yep, your stawmen are indeed straw. You know they are not genuine alternatives, just debating points. Fred
Those are most certainly not strawmen. Will Beback has been arguing that the POV of a claimed aggrieved Wikipedia editor is automatically relevant to all articles. You can't say that fits NPOV.
- d.