At 01:14 AM 2/23/2004 +0000, Allan Crossman wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Jimbo needs to officially sanction our revert policy and sysops should be allowed to ban users for 24 hours if they violate it.
After all I've laid out - you want to ban him for a mere 24 hours?
Hopefully that means _every_ time they violate it.
I wouldn't exactly say I'm mad as hell, but I'm certainly nonplussed over how the Wikipedia system bends so far over backwards to be "nice" to incorrigibly disruptive people like this. Surely at some point the "cost" in driving away other contributors who can't stand working with them must be outweighing the "benefit" of making sure we don't accidentally ban participants who could potentially be valuable contributors some time down the road? Not to mention the sheer amount of work some of these users create in cleaning up after them.