On 5/29/07, The Mangoe the.mangoe@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/29/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
The problem also has nothing to do with admin tools, so using an RFA to push the alleged solution is utterly inappropriate.
Well, this is a good point. And as it happens, all three of the incidents that set everyone on their ears were perpetrated by ordinary editors.
This notion that admins must agree with everyone and know policy like the
back of their hand is bullshit of the highest order.
And yet more good points. What a personal act of sabotage against one potential administrator, though. I don't think it was about the attack sites at all, simply an agenda to puddle vitriole--kinda like a personal attack site on Wikipedia, in a way. Maybe *this* attack site should have been banned from the RfA.
And don't post links to Wikipedia editor outings on this list, please, or request it here. What's the purpose?
KP