In a message dated 7/13/2008 9:46:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, snowspinner@gmail.com writes:
I mean, I do not see how we can justify making the position Ken is holding here one we demand sources for. It is demonstrably a less difficult and complex inference than ones we allow by default. I do not doubt your good faith in asserting otherwise, but unless there's something I'm missing, you are completely and utterly wrong.>>
-------------------- Ok so he says that the katakana, hiragana, etc. transliteration is unambiguous, and all I have to do to counter that is to say, "No, it's actually ambiguous".
And one of those positions is more correct because ? what? Because someone says so without actually demonstrating any citation whatsoever to the specific or general statement. Just their say-so.
That's really your position? Because I have no idea from where a position like that comes. It's certainly not the sort of position to which I'm accustomed.
Will Johnson
**************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com! (http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)