All good things must come to an end.
Fred
On Nov 4, 2005, at 12:41 AM, steve v wrote:
To resurrect a case requires dabbling in the sinister arts -- not often associated with justice or fairness. I would argue that 're-deciding' a case cannot be fairly done without actually 're-hearing' the case.
Understandably, the Arbcom would prefer to make things easy on themselves (theyve been through a lot after all), but --just to cheer things up --I contend that a re-deciding an old case without re-hearing it is improper -- putting aside the /double-jeopardy/ hung-jury/ mistrial/ precedents involved.
-Stevertigo "If it doesn't fit, you must aquit."