Numerous diffs were viewed and what was seen was Jguk reverting over and over giving reasons which have no basis in Wikipedia policy.
Fred
On Jun 19, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Rick wrote:
--- Rebecca misfitgirl@gmail.com wrote:
Folks, if you don't provide evidence, then don't be surprise when your concerns aren't included in a ruling. The vast amount of evidence there points to the conclusion I noted before - there are piles upon piles of examples of Jguk systematically changing stuff, and about four examples of SouthernComfort doing the same thing. We can only consider what is put before us, and almost all of that relates to Jguk.
-- ambi
Rebecca, I respect you tremendously, but, forgive me, this just sounds like laziness to me. If the arbcomm is given a diff, can't they look at the various versions of the article in question, or are they ironclad bound to only look at the single diff?
RickK
Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l