David Alexander Russell wrote:
Well obviously if it is clearly a child's toy, then it would not meet my suggestion ('posing with a _sex_ toy').
When it comes to that disputed lolicon picture I would not independently have noticed that the teddy bear had an erection. It only became apparent when I was told. How many of us noticed that without being told.
The Danish cartoons that caused the fuss among Muslims could not have been obvious representations of the prophet until somebody said so. Nobody knows what Mohammed really looked like because there were no cameras in the 7th century.
A picture of a child holding a big cigar is not implicitly a representation the child's erotic fantasies about his or her father until somebody says so. As Freud said :"Sometimes a cigar is only a cigar"
A good writer or artist can bring out the erotic in situations where you would never imagine it possible. Companies spend enormous amounts of money trying to achieve software security, but the hackers still find their way around the protection.
Ec