-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
geni stated for the record:
On 1/17/06, Jimmy Wales jwales@wikia.com wrote:
Hermione1980 wrote:
The first problems I see are 1. transparency
I see no problem with transparency. Transparency doesn't mean that we are in any way required to carry every little snippet of non-notable discussion on things forever.
It pretty much does.
To my amazement, I agree with geni.
I want to keep a public record of exactly how mind-boggling hostile AfD is, and what a horrific experience it is to have an article one has worked on subjected to that vicious process.
We need AfD to remain /fully/ transparent, at least internally, so that the myriad insults and assumptions of bad faith are not hidden.
You think AfD is toxic now, just wait until no one can be held accountable for their attacks!
- -- Sean Barrett | To bite off your shadow is neither easy nor sean@epoptic.org | painless. It demands a single-mindedness | that is almost unknown in this day.