I'll decline, but is "willfully misreading claims to construct straw man arguments and thus have a position of alleged moral superiority" in the article? Because if not, it really should be.
As for your other complaint, Wikipedia policy pages are descriptive. When we are faced with a new problem, we do not spend a month or more working out a policy and then go to look if the problem is still around so we can fix it. Rather, we fix the problem, and if a particular style of solution to a particular style of problem becomes regular, we might get around to writing a policy page about it, but we're more likely to go watch TV.
-Snowspinner
On Jul 6, 2005, at 5:16 PM, SPUI wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
If your questions are of value you can ask them with your name. Otherwise you're just attempting to troll from cover.
I see no evidence of trolling, simply a legitimate question. Maybe you have a different definition of trolling. Try adding "disagreeing with the people in charge" to [[trolling]] and see how long it is before you're reverted. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l