On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Casey Browncbrown1023.ml@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Turveyandrewrturvey@googlemail.com wrote:
<snip>
I've seen (source:Wikipedia) quoted a few times on media pictures now.
Well, that's the media. :-) They're used to being able to just say random things like "source: Reuters" that make no sense whatsoever.
That's true. But even print sources *should* give a full credit line if asked to do so.
That should ideally include the name of the photographer, and that it is GFDL content. Technically, I'm not sure if Wikipedia even needs to be mentioned (we are just the middleman), but I'm sure there is some clause somewhere that requires it.
Carcharoth