Erik Moeller wrote:
I do not remember seeing any messages which I considered of possible value.
Please consider rethinking this philosophy, Erik, and consider the possibility that (a) your view of what is "of possible value" may not coincide with everyone else's, and (b) your action *may* have been wrong *from the point of view of others*. Even if nothing in the thread had been "of possible value" indeed, it can nevertheless be viewed as wrong of you to intervene with the operation of a board that you are not even participating in. Please realise that this *can* be a cause for grief and annoyance, and if so, that you are responsible for it.
Unless Anthere apologizes to me
Other than the inappropriate reference to the de-sysopping of 168, which has nothing to do with this issue, I do not see anything in this thread that Anthère should be required to apologise for. Quite to the contrary, if I followed this all correctly, you were the one who deleted that thread. It seems more appropriate that you should apologise for that, and consider not doing it again in the future.
It seems that you feel that your ability to administer the board is being questioned. I understand that it can be taken that way. But, as has been said, even the greatest leaders make mistakes, and they are not great leaders if they cannot admit their mistakes and learn from them.
Timwi