On 12/12/05, stevertigo vertigosteve@yahoo.com wrote:
--- The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
What evidence do you have that I'm being sarcastic?
Intuition.
I actually am so glad that I don't have to believe in science for all those engineers and scientists who do make my nice pretty computers and internets and lightbulbs and keyboards and mp3 encodings and electric guitars so i can listen to blink 182, which rocks the hardest.
Why do you say that science has little compatibility
with religion?
I wrote 'for sake of argument, if we say...'
Okay, why, for the sake of argument, do we say that? I mean, is there any evidence to support that claim? Because if there's not, it's pretty silly to start a discussion based on the claim.
Are you making the claim that science is inconsistent with religion? If so, how?
No. See above.
Not even for the sake of argument?
Speaking of the church dating scene, I wouldn't denigrate the biological imperative for a reason for people's behavior.
No denigration was implied.
Ah. I used my intuition there.