On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:30:21 +0000, "Fred Bauder" fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
You greatly underestimate the efficiency of our deletion procedure and its capacity to adapt. Faced with a plethora of lists, it will kick into gear. Such lists are usually original research anyway. Who publishes such lists?
Indeed. And if the subject of the list (e.g. birds native to Chicago) is not itself encyclopaedic - i.e. if we have no article on birds native to Chicago - then the list itself may well be deleted as unencyclopaedic, arbitrary, original research or whatever.
Guy (JzG)