Well, I guess we got beaten to the punch on stable versions.
-Phil
On Aug 5, 2007, at 2:04 AM, David Goodman wrote:
from Chronicle of Higher Education, Wired Campus blog. http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=2278
"software that color-codes Wikipedia entries, identifying those portions deemed trustworthy and those that might be taken with a grain of salt.
To determine which passages make the grade, the researchers analyzed Wikipedia's editing history, tracking material that has remained on the site for a long time and edits that have been quickly overruled. A Wikipedian with a distinguished record of unchanged edits is declared trustworthy, and his or her contributions are left untouched on the Santa Cruz team's color-coded pages. But a contributor whose posts have frequently been changed or deleted is considered suspect, and his or her content is highlighted in orange. (The darker the orange, the more spurious the content is thought to be.)"
Examples at http://trust.cse.ucsc.edu/
Wikimania 2007 talk: http://trust.cse.ucsc.edu/UCSC_Wiki_Lab action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wikimania07.pdf
by Luca de Alfaro B. Thomas Adler Marco Faella Ian Pye Caitlin Sadowski
-- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l