On 03/01/07, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
It's a perfectly fine, non-biased article that is hurting NOONE by its existence and represents real effort by the contributors. Why does it need to be deleted? WHY?
I've always thought the underlying justification for unnecessary deletionism (the deleting of articles which are factually accurate and verifiable) is elitism. IMO, it detracts from Wikipedia.