WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
I noticed as I was fixing up one article that we appearently have a tag bibleverse that links to *one specific* website.
I'm not comfortable with that sort of approach. It seems to highly favor a particular bible website over other similar ones.
Where appropriate, links to Wikisource should be preferred. The Zondervan/Harper-Collins site has a TOS that claims copyright on everything; it applies "regardless of whether your access or use is intended". Claiming copyright on every version of the Bible that they host vaguely resembles copyfraud.
Some of the more recent versions may indeed be copyright encumbered, but it would be a good beginning if some of these 2000+ bibleverse links that are for the King James version or some non-specific version were pointed to Wikisource.
Ec