On 30 May 2007 at 12:59:56 -0400, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
WR doesn't qualify for citation under [[WP:V]] or [[WP:RS]].
That straw man has resurfaced so many times that I'm tempted to coin a new term, "[[Bobblehead doll]] argument", for one which keeps bouncing back up every time it's knocked down.
As others have said, it's not as a source in an article that anybody has been or intends on using that site (except perhaps for a future article on the site itself, if it should become sufficiently notable, or maybe on [[Criticisms of Wikipedia]] -- the sole thing that it would ever be a source for would be about itself and the views espoused by its participants). The places it might turn up include discussion and project pages, which are not subject to WP:V, WP:RS, or even WP:NPOV.