Maveric149 (Daniel Mayer) wrote in part:
Viajero wrote:
I am opposed (along with several others) to the inclusion of this phrase. I believe it uses weaselspeak to insert a moral judgement on the subject.
I thought that the phrase at OBL was "in the West he is widely regarded as a [[terrorism | terrorist]]". This is factually correct and taking it out is censorship and advocating for a certain POV. That will not be tolerated.
What does that mean, "That will not be tolerated."?
From here, it sounds like you are dictating to Viajero
what the content of Wikipedia articles is going to be. But I know that you know that you cannot do this (anymore than he can dictate the content to you), so it's not clear to me what you meant.
-- Toby