It doesn't look like anything technical would be required. If there is a concensus on the talk page, then mark in the comments that it is a version that everyone seems happy with. Mark R.
--- Andrew Lih andrew.lih@gmail.com wrote:
Why not have milestones done the usual wiki way?
Try consensus first, then do voting.
No fancy mechanisms or sysop only policies.
-Andrew (User:Fuzheado)
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:15:10 +0800, ruimu uestc ruimu@uestc.edu.cn wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "The Cunctator" cunctator@kband.com To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Just gently _mark_
milestones
On 10/12/04 6:01 AM, "Daniel P.B.Smith"
dpbsmith@verizon.net wrote:
How about providing this minimal amount of
mechanism:
a) A way of marking a particular edit as a
"milestone."
b) The ability to mark an edit as a milestone
would be suitably
restricted to people, probably sysops, who
would agree to be governed
by discussion, consensus, policy, etc. TBD.
Instead of restricting the power to sysops,
everyone (registered) should
be
able to vote, with clear criteria. You'd get
something like the
recommended
diaries at Daily Kos.
*Or* the process of becoming a sysop should
become automated so that most
regular users are sysops.
And stating that only "high level" sysops can
unmark milestones...
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- Andrew Lih andrew.lih@gmail.com _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com