On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:42 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/2008 9:49:46 AM Pacific Standard Time, cdhowie@gmail.com writes:
<< But seriously. You aren't suggesting that for real, are you? >>
Not death to the internets :) Just all wiki talk, on-wiki. I've been a strong advocate for absolute and complete transparency, which includes meta-talk, for some time.
Good luck making that happen. You would need absolute control over the lives of every administrator to pull that off.
But seriously, even if there is a secret channel, and some on-wiki action is taken as a result of that discussion, you have every right to demand to know why. And if the acting administrator didn't clarify his reasons for the action he would stand a good chance of getting desysoped.