On 27 March 2012 18:05, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
Anything which is *different* between BLP and policies for other articles, such as a no-eventualism policy, could conceivably be a benefit. My complaint is about BLP rules that do not do this.
"No sloppiness" applied with rigour is a quantitive difference that makes a qualitative difference.
You seem to be arguing mathematical logic when the issue is how to motivate humans to behave a particular way.
- d.