Danny did nothing wrong. I intend to follow his example.
If I see people fighting over an article, I'm going to protect it and tell them to chill out.
AND I reserve the right to choose which "old version" to revert to.
Obviously, you have to do this.
AND FURTHERMORE, if I can figure out a neutral way to fix the article, I see no ethical reason not to:
- make ONE edit
No, this violates the sysop/editor distinction. Please don't do that. By making an edit and subsequently protecting it, you are giving it a raised status. This is entirely unacceptable.
Regards,
Erik