On 7/13/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:05:44 +0100, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
"There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative "I heard it somewhere" pseudo information is to be tagged with a "needs a cite" tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons." - Jimmy Wales.
Not consitant with what Mr Wales has been up to [[Talk:Che Guevara]]. It's a fun read.
RfC is the second door on your left down the hall.
Um what for? The last I checked the debate over Mr Wales's stuff was over pending him provideing any sources. There is a secondary debate going on but that isn't really relivant to the article.
Depends. Sometimes it's a great idea.
No it isn't.
But hard cases make bad law.
If you regard the majority of our articles as hard changes I would suggest you are useing the wrong law.