On 6/28/07, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/07, C.J. Croy cjcroy@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Freecycle_Network
Have you ever seen a greater quantity of "citation needed", "neutrality disputed", and other such tags and templates in one article?
Yes. Your article wins if we judge solely on the controversies section, but this article<
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Crazy_8%2527s&direction=pr...
wins
if we judge based on tag density in the overall article.<
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Crazy_8%2527s&direction=pr...
I don't know why people do this. I suppose it's an improvement over deleting the info with a vague edit summary such as "Per BLP".
OH MY GAWD. {{dubious}}? {{cn}}?? {{an}}??
Agggggh. Just edit the freaking articles, already. If people want to get into flamewars, do it on the talk page. _______________________________________________
Another example I encountered today. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Igor_Stravinsky&curid=38172&am...
Was this overtagging? I think so, the article has plenty of sources, just not everything is cited. Plus the information tagged with {{fact}} does not seem controversial or possibly false.
Garion96