On 23/07/05, steve v vertigosteve@yahoo.com wrote:
Making a separate NPOV committee for handling specifically npov issues would save work for both AC and MC, and would be a natural and responsive expansion of the committee model to focus on an extremely important aspect.
As I understand it, BDFL approval is required to form a new formal committee, though in the interests of responsiveness, that too might need some abstraction.
This is something that has been discussed. A lot. It didn't come to anything though:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/RFC
Dan