On 6/30/07, Nick Wilkins nlwilkins@gmail.com wrote:
It wasn't presented as a reliable source for the article (in the sense of supporting any factual assertions). It, like the list Chris provided earlier, was presented as a rebuttal to the claim that the media has completely forgotten about the whole affair. The media clearly hasn't forgotten about it.
-- Jonel
The media does not forget a lot of things. That does not make them notable enough to be article worthy. Media will repetively remind us useless information. Your argument is perfectly fine for wikinews just not for wikipedia.
- White Cat
On 6/30/07, The Mangoe the.mangoe@gmail.com wrote:
It is incontrovertibly a reliable source for the continuing notability of the incident.
I do not think thats an accurate assessment. Just because something is covered, doesn't make it notable. Just as something not covered on media is not non-notable.
- White Cat