I don't see the point in suppressing the image of a naked pre-pubescent girl. Are you claiming that such an image is obscene or something?
Wouldn't a conclusion like that be best left up to the courts to decide? I would have no problem suppressing images that a court has actually decided are obscene. But suppressing in-advance sure smells like censorship to me. And a type of censorship that no Western government is actually practicing.
Whether the image is obscene or not is irrelevant; whether suppression is censorship (as it is) is also irrelevant. What's relevant is whether or not such an image is appropriate for an encyclopedia such as Wikipedia claims to be, and whether or not including it is in accordance with established standards of content scholarship.
—Thomas Larsen