Florence Devouard wrote:
Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) wrote:
I think we need some input from the Office as to how this situation
should
be handled on-wiki.
Newyorkbrad
On 3/25/07, Jeff Raymond jeff.raymond@internationalhouseofbacon.com
wrote:
Ron Ritzman wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't that comment be in an AFD nom or is this another one of those "Danial Brandt" deletes?
Yes.
-Jeff
-- If you can read this, I'm not at home.
I will say this much. In a cursory review of the situation, nothing should be done with regard to the restoration of this article until the Wikimedia Foundation office has had a chance to look at it in an official capacity; no matter what consensus Deletion Review may encounter. This will occur some time after 13h00 (UTC) Monday, March 26, when the office is open.
Discussion aside, without being able to discuss the matter from a legal standpoint, there's no case in restoring the article with the questionable content.
Cary Bass --- ~ bastique