JAY JG said:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
Quality of source is usually (but not always) POV. We're supposed to be writing NPOV articles. A caveat such as "warning: the article relies on population projections that were proven by events to be grossly in error" is fine and NPOV.
I doubt it would be fine according to the people who happen to believe those projections are correct. You sentence seems anything but NPOV.
If there still existed people who believe that the projections are correct, then this would not be an acceptable caveat. There are no established facts, only foreseeable objections to factual claims and ways of allaying those objections.