On 8/7/07, Kamryn Matika kamrynmatika@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/8/07, Ron Ritzman ritzman@gmail.com wrote:
I get the feeling the OP is about to drop the other shoe and say that wasn't done in [wp:articles_for_deletion/The weather_in_London]
/sigh
well if it was clearly an incorrect deletion there is [[WP:DRV]], it doesnt need to be argued about on the list
Overturn this travesty! Everyone should be able to look up "The weather in London" and find out that it's "Wet." One shouldn't have to miscapitalise london to get information! And there are lots of links to it! Clearly it's notable! And the keep vote is so much more persuasive! The article is true and succinct, so clearly it should have been kept. The crazy deltetionists [it's always spelled that way, right?] didn't cite any policy! It was speedied out of process! The VfD was only open for more than TWO MONTHS, which clearly wasn't enough time, since only three people voted! It was a Vote for Deletion and not an Article for Deletion, so it's even more invalid! And all the comments were on <s>April Fools' Day</s> Christmas Eve, so can't be taken seriously!
Ok, I'm done now. Sorry folks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_weather_in_...
-- Jonel