Reading again and comparing with other sites, I see that the text is probably not there because of protection, but only revision. I find it even more curious. Why does the text seem to say the version has been revised "subsequently" of being possibly covered by copyright ?
I read and read and read it again... and sorry, I think it is very confusing and possibly misleading.
ant
Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com wrote: Hi
While I was reading a protected article, I discovered at the bottom of the page the following disclaimer
This work may be protected by copyright. Please see 17 USC 108. This version of the article has been subsequently revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the GFDL.
----------------
I am *very* perplex. There are MANY reasons why an article can be protected on Wikipedia, and I would dare saying that having part of its content under copyright is probably the least probable reason for it to be restricted in edition. Protection is most of the time against vandalism or to cool down spirits. On the contrary, if an article contains factual inaccuracies or copyrighted material, it should be OPEN to editing so that it can be fixed as quickly as possible.
I perceive this disclaimer as possibly be meant to protect ourselves... but also as giving a very inacurate reason why we protect articles...
Second, WHY this reference to the US law code here?
Anthere
--------------------------------- Sell on Yahoo! Auctions - No fees. Bid on great items. --------------------------------- Sell on Yahoo! Auctions - No fees. Bid on great items.