on 2/1/11 5:32 PM, David Goodman at dggenwp@gmail.com wrote:
<Snip>
We have something that has proven successful far beyond any expectations. It puzzles me why anyone would want to risk a fundamental change in its structure.
Because it, as well as its needs, have grown beyond its original structure.
Let it continue as far as relative anarchy can take it.
And then what, David?
It cannot do everything, or suit
everybody. If one wants something different, try other projects.
David, are you really saying what I hear you saying - ["]If you don't like the way things are, go someplace else["]?!
Marc
<Snip>
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 February 2011 20:33, Fred Bauder fredbaud@fairpoint.net wrote:
You propose a political boss. Utterly unacceptable, Napoleonic even.
The arbcom are already politicians, elected and all. Wikipedia is a city of 160,000 people any given month. Politics happens when two people are in the same room, let alone 160,000.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l