Sue Reed wrote:
They are not sourced and there are a bunch of statements like "The reason often given for its retirement ..."
In my opinion, any such statement should be removed on sight by any editor, with a firm statement on the talk page that Wikipedia is not the place for idle speculation or original research.
As we get more and more articles, we are doomed to be hoaxed badly if we do not insist on sources.
----- Original Message ---- From: Jimmy Wales jwales@wikia.com To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:55:42 AM Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] And you thought Pokémon was trivial...
Justin Cormack wrote:
The main article includes the memorable part: "Not all episodes of the Cullen run are believed to exist, although many of them do. All episodes of the other versions are believed to exist."
Is there a source? My main concern about all this fancruft is that we are absolutely going to get burned by a hoaxer if we do not become much more serious about banning original research and mercilessly editing stuff that has no sources.
--Jimbo
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l