On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Alex G g1ggyman@gmail.com wrote:
And by the same strong argument there is no reason to keep them there. Sure, we're not censored, but that doesn't mean we need to be stubborn when a (sort of) uncensored solution exists.
Wouldn't "solution" require the petitioners to agree to the idea that showing drawings of people they consider to be prophets can shown when the title of the page is called "depiction of X"?
Mathias