On Jul 14, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Sarah wrote:
On 7/14/06, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:05:53 +0100, David Boothroyd david@election.demon.co.uk wrote: According to his fan-club, that would violate the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act. That is the entire basis of their legal threats, that the disclosure of the conviction is motivated by malice and is therefore proscribed. This is, of course, complete bollocks in as much as I would not know Lauder-Frost from a hole in the ground, and the editor who did most of the work on the conviction, including paying for a Lexis-Nexis search, is not even British.
I must admit I did wonder who had done the digging around on GLF, and why. The article about the incident under discussion is, as I recall, from 16 years ago or thereabouts.
Sarah
I think there is some motivation to discredit his political viewpoint.
Fred