Ahh, wrong link, its http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia obviously. Sorry 'bout that
A website who's sole aim is combating bias, and they don't even know what bias means. Most of that page is just a list of Wikipedia's mistakes (many of which they acknowledge have since been fixed) - few of them are mistakes that indicate bias. For example, they complain that our mathematical articles aren't sufficiently rigorous - I wasn't aware that rigour was a conservative quality...