On 9/26/07, Armed Blowfish diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
On 26/09/2007, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
But using Wikipaedia to attack the 'evil banned users' is tolerated and encouraged....
Yep! Death to the vandals! Death to the POV pushers!
So is it any wonder that there are so many websites which attack Wikipaedians, given that Wikipaedia attacked them first? And no, that doesn't make what the other attack sites do right, but it is an example of how Wikipaedia fails to protect its own, caring more about attacking the banned users et. al. than caring for its own people. Hey, Wikipaedia will even join in on the attacks on its people....
Stopping vandals isn't attacking, it's defending against an attack.
Saying the vandals are right to attack /again/ through the infamous "attack sites" is OK since the poor vandals are the victims is ... (sorry, I'm not a native speaker of English, so I lack the words to express just how perverse that is).
Magnus