I think we are thinking about creating a committee to consider whether there is published authority for information, popular or unpopular. Beyond that it might consider the reputation and credibility of the source, but first it must pass the threshold of whether it exists at all. There is also the question of whether it is reasonably convenient to access it. For example, a NYT's article might cost 2 bucks but something that requires accessing Nexus or consulting an obscure journal is much more expensive.
Fred
On Jun 6, 2005, at 8:25 AM, Sean Barrett wrote:
I am very worried that we are seriously discussing the formation of a committee empowered to prohibit unpopular content from Wikipedia and to ban those that feel that it is important to record it