Generally speaking we only need to protect pages that attract a lot of vandalism. What edits are these anons making? Are they trying to alter the policy or are they trying to fix spelling or something? Only the first issue needs protection.
Mgm
On 10/9/06, Ligulem ligulem@pobox.com wrote:
What's the purpose of letting non-autoconfirmed accounts edit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Semi-protection_policy? (other than causing work for others to revert the 97% crap and making noise on watchlists)
Why can't we simply semi-protect that? (Or do we need yet another policy for doing so?)
Or is this a wiki-religious thing?
Puzzled,
--Ligulem
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l