"Chris Lüer" chris@zandria.net wrote in message news:6.2.3.4.2.20050919093012.03d15dd8@mail.zandria.net... [snip]
An example of what I'm thinking of: [[Attila the Hun]] has a whole bunch of pictures of Attila -- but all of them are fictional. To the credit of the article, it is actually mentioned that there are no real pictures of him. But this is way at the end, and the first fictional picture is at the very beginning of the article. Unexperienced readers that don't read all the way to the end might be misled into accepting these pictures as factual representations.
Proper captions should help: does the caption for that picture not give proper attribution? {{sofixit}}
Shouldn't the same encyclopedic standards we have for text be applied to images, too?
Yes.