--- Tony Wilson list@redhill.net.au wrote:
Let's get a few things straight, shall we?
There was *one* single objector to the compromise we hammered out
Not true at all. I still object, but I was attacked so fiercely I decided I didn't need the abuse any more. I moved on to get it elsewhere.
an objector who practically never bothers to contribute anything to the fauna articles in any case, just talks about them at great length, and wastes enormous amounts of the time of the people who *are* doing the work, and causes a great deal of genuine distress to useful contributors.
I am sick and tired of your continuing characterization of people who disagree with you as not participating. There are many ways to participate in Wikipedia.
At the conclusion of the debate, I waited several days extra just to make sure that there was indeed a consensus before going to work on the bird and mammal entries.
There is no consensus, you just shut the objectors up with your continuing personal attacks.
Zoe
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com