On 3/8/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/8/06, Mark Wagner carnildo@gmail.com wrote:
The "CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat" tag is a problem: of the seven images so tagged, two of them had decidedly non-free "provided that" clauses, forbidding modification and commercial use.
I don't remember if I ever asked this question, but are "non-commercial use" images acceptable at all?
They are permitted if and only if they were uploaded before May 2005, and even then, they should be deleted when a replacement is found.
Also, you didn't really just manually check 2000 images did you???
No. I wrote a program to count every template applied to the images, then spent an hour removing non-license templates, sorting, categorizing, and merging duplicates.
-- Mark [[User:Carnildo]]