tarquin wrote:
So can I write about the cat that was stuck up a tree in the next street from me? The local press gave in plenty of coverage!
Are there links? Would it be possible for others to confirm the story?
I hope people don't waste much time writing such pages, but it strikes me as much more of a waste to fight against someone who wanted to include them. I have no problem with a social stigma against writing such pages (just as there is and should be a social stigma against writing articles about ourselves), but a policy of deletion that goes beyond confirmability seems to me to invite more conflict than it would be worth.
Such pages...
1. Do not belong in Wikipedia 1.0 (paper edition), because such will be selected with an eye towards the cost of production
2. Ought not to be linked from the front page (which is space-constrained to deal with only big events and major conceptual topics)
But other than that, what's the harm?
One possible objection I can imagine is cluttering the search results. But the best solution to that, I think, would be to have a refined search engine that limits the impact of minor pages. There are a number of ways to do that, but in any event, it seems unlikely to be a huge problem anyway just because people aren't going to be so interested in writing that many pages of this type.
And that's especially true if we more or less just ignore the practice.
--Jimbo