Magnus Manske wrote:
geni wrote:
On 11/24/05, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/11/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
P.S.: What's so bad about knowing that people like our article about exploding whales?
Because it would mean they were not that interested in our articles on canals.
There's an awful lot of articles on the net about canals. There's entire academic courses at MIT you can go and read about canals, or a thousand and one good bits of writing, pitched at the right level, discussing canals. There's one good article on the net about exploding whales.
Why be ashamed we have that one good article that they *can't* go elsewhere and read?
Because you can never have too many pages on canals.
Relating to a recent thread on wikipedia-l, I hereby demand an article on every canal in the world, present or past!
Obviously the one on root canal should be a candidate for feature article. :-)