As people are constantly pointing out to me, admins have the right to block accounts for simple vandalism, not ban users. The importance is that an account that is blocked does not 'carry over' to another 'sock puppet' that does not vandalise. A ban would. Mark
--- Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
--- Theresa Robinson robinst@MIT.EDU wrote:
Just wondering, is the argument that the current
vandalism behaviour is
not a bannable offense, or that it isn't
necessarily Wik? If the first,
wow is the AC ever tolerant.
Every admin already has the authority to ban vandals. Since it is plainly obvious that Wik has become a vandal, then there is no question that he is banned for an indefinite period of time. This is outside the AC's jurisdiction and I'm baffled why Fred thinks we need to rule on this.
-- mav
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com